2012 and All That ? an offer Olympics - recreation-sports
The day was 6 July 2005. Raffles City Convention Centre in Singapore was the venue. The special occasion was the 117 th Ordinary Session of the IOC (International Olympic Committee). The purpose was to meet and vote for the city to the modern Olympic Games Summer XXX host.
At first it had to struggle to keep nine cities of the Olympic Games in 2012. On 18 May 2004, reduced the five major candidates. Havana, Istanbul, Leipzig andRio de Janeiro were ineffective in their efforts to influence the technical evaluation and were excluded from the proceedings to continue.
Five names were submitted on the last voting mechanism. The cities were chosen for the decisive verdict in London, Madrid, Moscow, New York and Paris. Of these, brought the influence of Paris, the city was more likely.
Thus, the fateful day arrived in 2005 and the IOC met in Singapore on a decision that would agree to bring theenormous impact on the budget.
The approach is based. Each of the 104 eligible participants who had attended a consecutive series of votes held by secret ballot. After each round of voting if no candidate city had the majority of the votes cast received the final, the city with the fewest votes would be closed and a vote will take place next.
Anxious after a few rounds, three challengers have emerged to vote than high hopes from the five nominees. London, Madrid and Paris. Moscow hadfell at the first hurdle and New York was eliminated after the second ballot.
In contrast to the fact that Madrid and London also interviewed voices a bit "more than Paris in the first two rounds were, was the French capital is still regarded by many as favorite considered the ultimate price to get. Due to the number of electoral behavior of some delegates The IOC, in the next phase of the vote in last year in Madrid, where the race was conducted in the second ballot with 32 votes, was stopped only 31 electoral votes. The leftLondon to Paris in the final vote face.
The hypothesis of widespread press and professional guess is that Paris "had in his pocket."
Offer in London had been as many positive elements in the reports of the IOC in 2004 and 2005 produced were investigated. But the general opinion in the various committees of the IOC Evaluation Commission that Paris was in front of his opponent cross-channel.
Shareholders also seemed against Great Britain. Offers preventiveBirmingham (1992) and twice from Manchester (1996 and 2000) were all failed pretty bad. Given that Paris had for the Olympic Games in 1992 and again in 2008 when he finished third behind Beijing supports hot favorites. The general feeling in the run-up to the 117 th Session of the IOC was that Paris had to offer was triumphant.
The final decision is now history. Team GB celebrate at the convention center are more in step with wild shouts of joy by a large amountView the proceedings live on the big screen built in Trafalgar Square in London. The location of the home crowd was perhaps predictive ? the Battle of Trafalgar, perhaps the most famous British victories over their opponents for a long time.
Thus London is the first city to have the privilege to host the modern Olympic Games three times had the privilege in the summer of 1908 and 1948.
But what will be the eventual financialLast of London and its taxpayers?
But when the games are seen in the light of history is certainly a question: Who will end up paying for the Olympic Games London 2012 cost?
Can the British capital the company, the unusual trick to do to a modern Olympic Games and a realistic profit from it? Or will a legacy of guilt long after the visual splendor of the sport, which we certainly expect in the fall of 2012?
Source: http://sports-olympics.chailit.com/2012-and-all-that-an-offer-olympics.html
chargers meteor shower haaretz george lopez sytycd denver broncos powerball numbers

